Scoreo

Tigres UANL vs CF PachucaLiga MX 2018

Tigres UANL
Tigres UANL
FT
00
HT: 00
CF Pachuca
CF Pachuca
11/10/2019Liga MXLiga MX · Apertura - 18Estadio Universitario de Nuevo León

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 150+ matches

Tigres UANL49%
×Draw25%
CF Pachuca26%
Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side
Model
49.7%
Always home
44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

Tigres UANL
1.63
CF Pachuca
1.11

Tigres UANL creates 47% more chances

Season form · 161 home / 150 away

creates per match

Tigres UANL
1.83
CF Pachuca
1.32

allows per match

Tigres UANL
0.91
CF Pachuca
1.43

finishing

Tigres UANL+0.00on par
CF Pachuca+0.00on par

Total goals

52%Over
  • Over52
  • Under48

Close call

Both teams score

54%Yes
  • Yes54
  • No46

Both teams likely to score

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

Tigres UANL

CF Pachuca
0
1
2
3
4
0
006%
017%
024%
031%
040%
1
1011%
1112%
126%
132%
141%
2
209%
2110%
225%
232%
241%
3
305%
315%
323%
331%
340%
4
402%
412%
421%
430%
440%

Most likely 1–1 (12%) · grid covers 97% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5
94%6%1.5
76%24%2.5
52%48%3.5
29%71%4.5
14%86%

Double chance

Tigres UANL or draw
74%
Tigres UANL or CF Pachuca
75%
Draw or CF Pachuca
51%

Winning margin

Tigres UANL wins by 2+
26%
CF Pachuca wins by 2+
10%

Team goals

Tigres UANL 1+ goals
80%
Tigres UANL 2+ goals
48%
Tigres UANL 3+ goals
22%
CF Pachuca 1+ goals
67%
CF Pachuca 2+ goals
30%
CF Pachuca 3+ goals
10%

Draw no bet

Tigres UANL (draw refunded)
66%
CF Pachuca (draw refunded)
34%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals
42%
Both score & under 3
12%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

Tigres UANL at homecreates 1.83, concedes 0.91 · 161 matches

CF Pachuca awaycreates 1.32, concedes 1.43 · 150 matches

Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

Tigres UANL attack 1.83 + CF Pachuca defence 1.43 → ÷2 → 1.63

CF Pachuca attack 1.32 + Tigres UANL defence 0.91 → ÷2 → 1.11

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 49%?"

Tigres UANL scores more
49%
level
25%
CF Pachuca scores more
26%

Tigres UANL at 49% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

  • injuries & suspensions
  • the matchday lineup
  • motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
  • weather & pitch condition
  • in-game coaching decisions

So 49% does not mean "Tigres UANL will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Probable lineups not yet announced

Starting lineups are usually confirmed ~1 hour before kickoff

Match Recap: Tigres UANL vs CF Pachuca

Tigres UANL and CF Pachuca drew 0-0 in Liga MX on November 10, 2019.

The match was played at Estadio Universitario de Nuevo León in San Nicolás de los Garza.