Scoreo
FootballHockeyTennisBasketballVolleyballHandballBaseballRugbyMMAFormula 1

FAP vs ISOHSA — Elite Two 2020

FAP
FAP
FT
3 – 3
HT: 3 – 2
ISOHSA
ISOHSA
1/11/2024Elite TwoElite Two · Round 14

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 20+ matches

FAP47%
×Draw26%
ISOHSA27%
✓ Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side
Model
49.7%
Always home
44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

FAP
1.46
ISOHSA
1.04

FAP creates 40% more chances

Season form · 50 home / 20 away

creates per match

FAP
1.32
ISOHSA
1.30

allows per match

FAP
0.78
ISOHSA
1.60

finishing

FAP+0.00on par
ISOHSA+0.00on par

Total goals

54%Under
  • Under54
  • Over46

Fewer than 3 goals likely

Both teams score

50%No
  • No50
  • Yes50

Close call

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

FAP ↓

ISOHSA →
0
1
2
3
4
0
0–08%
0–19%
0–24%
0–32%
0–40%
1
1–012%
1–112%
1–26%
1–32%
1–41%
2
2–09%
2–19%
2–25%
2–32%
2–40%
3
3–04%
3–14%
3–22%
3–31%
3–40%
4
4–02%
4–12%
4–21%
4–30%
4–40%

Most likely 1–0 (12%) · grid covers 98% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5
92%8%1.5
71%29%2.5
46%54%3.5
24%76%4.5
11%89%

Double chance

FAP or draw
73%
FAP or ISOHSA
74%
Draw or ISOHSA
53%

Winning margin

FAP wins by 2+
23%
ISOHSA wins by 2+
10%

Team goals

FAP 1+ goals
77%
FAP 2+ goals
43%
FAP 3+ goals
18%
ISOHSA 1+ goals
65%
ISOHSA 2+ goals
28%
ISOHSA 3+ goals
9%

Draw no bet

FAP (draw refunded)
63%
ISOHSA (draw refunded)
37%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals
37%
Both score & under 3
12%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

FAP at home — creates 1.32, concedes 0.78 · 50 matches

ISOHSA away — creates 1.30, concedes 1.60 · 20 matches

⚑ Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

FAP attack 1.32 + ISOHSA defence 1.60 → ÷2 → 1.46

ISOHSA attack 1.30 + FAP defence 0.78 → ÷2 → 1.04

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 47%?"

FAP scores more
47%
level
26%
ISOHSA scores more
27%

FAP at 47% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

  • injuries & suspensions
  • the matchday lineup
  • motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
  • weather & pitch condition
  • in-game coaching decisions

So 47% does not mean "FAP will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Probable lineups not yet announced

Starting lineups are usually confirmed ~1 hour before kickoff

Match Recap: FAP vs ISOHSA

FAP and ISOHSA drew 3-3 in Elite Two on January 11, 2024.