URA 0–1 Entebbe UPPC: Result & Stats

URA

FT

0 – 1

HT: 0 – 0

Entebbe UPPC

1/13/2026

Premier League · Round 12Hamz Stadium

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 15+ matches

URA42%

×Draw30%

Entebbe UPPC28%

✓ Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side

Model

49.7%

Always home

44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

URAExpected goals in this matchEntebbe UPPC

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

1.16

0.88

URA

1.16

Entebbe UPPC

0.88

URA creates 32% more chances

Season form · 100 home / 15 away

1.51

creates per match

1.00

0.76

allows per match

0.80

creates per match

URA

1.51

Entebbe UPPC

1.00

allows per match

URA

0.76

Entebbe UPPC

0.80

+0.00on par

finishing

+0.00on par

finishing

URA+0.00on par

Entebbe UPPC+0.00on par

Total goals

Under67
Over33

Fewer than 3 goals likely

Both teams score

No60
Yes40

One side may not score

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

URA ↓

Entebbe UPPC →

0

1

2

3

4

0

0–013%

0–111%

0–25%

0–31%

0–40%

1

1–015%

1–113%

1–26%

1–32%

1–40%

2

2–09%

2–18%

2–23%

2–31%

2–40%

3

3–03%

3–13%

3–21%

3–30%

3–40%

4

4–01%

4–11%

4–20%

4–30%

4–40%

Most likely 1–0 (15%) · grid covers 99% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5

87%13%1.5

60%40%2.5

33%67%3.5

15%85%4.5

6%94%

Double chance

URA or draw

72%

URA or Entebbe UPPC

70%

Draw or Entebbe UPPC

58%

Winning margin

URA wins by 2+

18%

Entebbe UPPC wins by 2+

9%

Team goals

URA 1+ goals

69%

URA 2+ goals

32%

URA 3+ goals

11%

Entebbe UPPC 1+ goals

59%

Entebbe UPPC 2+ goals

22%

Entebbe UPPC 3+ goals

6%

Draw no bet

URA (draw refunded)

60%

Entebbe UPPC (draw refunded)

40%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals

27%

Both score & under 3

13%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

URA at home — creates 1.51, concedes 0.76 · 100 matches

Entebbe UPPC away — creates 1.00, concedes 0.80 · 15 matches

⚑ Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

URA attack 1.51 + Entebbe UPPC defence 0.80 → ÷2 → 1.16

Entebbe UPPC attack 1.00 + URA defence 0.76 → ÷2 → 0.88

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 42%?"

URA scores more

42%

level

30%

Entebbe UPPC scores more

28%

URA at 42% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

injuries & suspensions
the matchday lineup
motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
weather & pitch condition
in-game coaching decisions

So 42% does not mean "URA will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Probable lineups not yet announced

Starting lineups are usually confirmed ~1 hour before kickoff