Scoreo

Kunshan vs Shanghai JiadingLeague One 2018

Kunshan
Kunshan
FT
20
HT: 10
Shanghai Jiading
Shanghai Jiading
9/8/2022League OneLeague One · Round 19Dalian Puwan Outfield

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 41+ matches

Kunshan60%
×Draw24%
Shanghai Jiading15%
Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side
Model
49.7%
Always home
44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

Kunshan
1.64
Shanghai Jiading
0.68

Kunshan creates 141% more chances

Season form · 41 home / 62 away

creates per match

Kunshan
1.76
Shanghai Jiading
0.58

allows per match

Kunshan
0.78
Shanghai Jiading
1.52

finishing

Kunshan+0.00on par
Shanghai Jiading+0.00on par

Total goals

59%Under
  • Under59
  • Over41

Fewer than 3 goals likely

Both teams score

60%No
  • No60
  • Yes40

One side may not score

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

Kunshan

Shanghai Jiading
0
1
2
3
4
0
0010%
017%
022%
031%
040%
1
1016%
1111%
124%
131%
140%
2
2013%
219%
223%
231%
240%
3
307%
315%
322%
330%
340%
4
403%
412%
421%
430%
440%

Most likely 1–0 (16%) · grid covers 97% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5
90%10%1.5
67%33%2.5
41%59%3.5
20%80%4.5
8%92%

Double chance

Kunshan or draw
85%
Kunshan or Shanghai Jiading
76%
Draw or Shanghai Jiading
40%

Winning margin

Kunshan wins by 2+
33%
Shanghai Jiading wins by 2+
4%

Team goals

Kunshan 1+ goals
81%
Kunshan 2+ goals
49%
Kunshan 3+ goals
23%
Shanghai Jiading 1+ goals
49%
Shanghai Jiading 2+ goals
15%
Shanghai Jiading 3+ goals
3%

Draw no bet

Kunshan (draw refunded)
80%
Shanghai Jiading (draw refunded)
20%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals
29%
Both score & under 3
11%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

Kunshan at homecreates 1.76, concedes 0.78 · 41 matches

Shanghai Jiading awaycreates 0.58, concedes 1.52 · 62 matches

Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

Kunshan attack 1.76 + Shanghai Jiading defence 1.52 → ÷2 → 1.64

Shanghai Jiading attack 0.58 + Kunshan defence 0.78 → ÷2 → 0.68

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 60%?"

Kunshan scores more
60%
level
24%
Shanghai Jiading scores more
15%

Kunshan at 60% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

  • injuries & suspensions
  • the matchday lineup
  • motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
  • weather & pitch condition
  • in-game coaching decisions

So 60% does not mean "Kunshan will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Probable lineups not yet announced

Starting lineups are usually confirmed ~1 hour before kickoff

Kunshan 2 – 0 Shanghai Jiading

Kunshan beat Shanghai Jiading 2-0 in League One on September 8, 2022.

The match was played at Dalian Puwan Outfield in Dalian.