Hart Acedemy 0–1 Bombada: Result & Stats

Hart Acedemy

FT

0 – 1

HT: 0 – 1

Bombada

1/20/2026

GFA League · Round 7

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 30+ matches

Hart Acedemy44%

×Draw30%

Bombada26%

✓ Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side

Model

49.7%

Always home

44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Hart AcedemyExpected goals in this matchBombada

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

1.21

0.86

Hart Acedemy

1.21

Bombada

0.86

Hart Acedemy creates 41% more chances

Season form · 30 home / 45 away

1.13

creates per match

0.89

0.83

allows per match

1.29

creates per match

Hart Acedemy

1.13

Bombada

0.89

allows per match

Hart Acedemy

0.83

Bombada

1.29

+0.00on par

finishing

+0.00on par

finishing

Hart Acedemy+0.00on par

Bombada+0.00on par

Total goals

Under66
Over34

Fewer than 3 goals likely

Both teams score

No60
Yes40

One side may not score

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

Hart Acedemy ↓

Bombada →

0

1

2

3

4

0

0–013%

0–111%

0–25%

0–31%

0–40%

1

1–015%

1–113%

1–26%

1–32%

1–40%

2

2–09%

2–18%

2–23%

2–31%

2–40%

3

3–04%

3–13%

3–21%

3–30%

3–40%

4

4–01%

4–11%

4–20%

4–30%

4–40%

Most likely 1–0 (15%) · grid covers 99% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5

87%13%1.5

61%39%2.5

34%66%3.5

16%84%4.5

6%94%

Double chance

Hart Acedemy or draw

74%

Hart Acedemy or Bombada

70%

Draw or Bombada

56%

Winning margin

Hart Acedemy wins by 2+

19%

Bombada wins by 2+

9%

Team goals

Hart Acedemy 1+ goals

70%

Hart Acedemy 2+ goals

34%

Hart Acedemy 3+ goals

12%

Bombada 1+ goals

58%

Bombada 2+ goals

21%

Bombada 3+ goals

6%

Draw no bet

Hart Acedemy (draw refunded)

63%

Bombada (draw refunded)

37%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals

27%

Both score & under 3

13%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

Hart Acedemy at home — creates 1.13, concedes 0.83 · 30 matches

Bombada away — creates 0.89, concedes 1.29 · 45 matches

⚑ Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

Hart Acedemy attack 1.13 + Bombada defence 1.29 → ÷2 → 1.21

Bombada attack 0.89 + Hart Acedemy defence 0.83 → ÷2 → 0.86

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 44%?"

Hart Acedemy scores more

44%

level

30%

Bombada scores more

26%

Hart Acedemy at 44% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

injuries & suspensions
the matchday lineup
motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
weather & pitch condition
in-game coaching decisions

So 44% does not mean "Hart Acedemy will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Probable lineups not yet announced

Starting lineups are usually confirmed ~1 hour before kickoff