22 de Julio 0–1 Ind. Juniors: Result & Stats

22 de Julio

FT

0 – 1

HT: 0 – 1

Ind. Juniors

K. Montano 45'

5/16/2026

Liga Pro Serie B · Round 10

Match Prediction

Statistical Prediction

Based on goals from last 25+ matches

22 de Julio39%

×Draw33%

Ind. Juniors28%

✓ Correct in 50 of 100 matches — 6 more than always backing the home side

Model

49.7%

Always home

44.3%

The model picks a winner (home or away) for each finished match using only pre-kickoff data, then checks it against the real result: 49.7% correct across 106,786 matches, vs 44.3% for always backing the home side.

Home picks 50.7% correct · Away picks 47.3% correct

Football matches only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

22 de JulioExpected goals in this matchInd. Juniors

Expected goals in this match

What is xG?

Every shot is scored 0–1 by how likely it is to be a goal from that spot — a chance in the middle of the box ≈ 0.4, a long shot from a tight angle ≈ 0.03, a penalty ≈ 0.76. Add them up over a match and that is the xG.

The scoreline can lie: you can win 1-0 on a fluke while creating half the chances. xG shows who was really closer to scoring — and over a season it predicts results better than goals alone.

1.01

0.80

22 de Julio

1.01

Ind. Juniors

0.80

22 de Julio creates 26% more chances

Season form · 25 home / 124 away

0.88

creates per match

1.01

0.60

allows per match

1.15

creates per match

22 de Julio

0.88

Ind. Juniors

1.01

allows per match

22 de Julio

0.60

Ind. Juniors

1.15

+0.00on par

finishing

+0.00on par

finishing

22 de Julio+0.00on par

Ind. Juniors+0.00on par

Total goals

Under73
Over27

Fewer than 3 goals likely

Both teams score

No65
Yes35

One side may not score

Score probability

Probability of each scoreline, %

22 de Julio ↓

Ind. Juniors →

0

1

2

3

4

0

0–016%

0–113%

0–25%

0–31%

0–40%

1

1–017%

1–113%

1–25%

1–31%

1–40%

2

2–08%

2–17%

2–23%

2–31%

2–40%

3

3–03%

3–12%

3–21%

3–30%

3–40%

4

4–01%

4–11%

4–20%

4–30%

4–40%

Most likely 1–0 (17%) · grid covers 99% of scorelines

More markets

Total goals

OverUnder0.5

84%16%1.5

54%46%2.5

27%73%3.5

11%89%4.5

4%96%

Double chance

22 de Julio or draw

72%

22 de Julio or Ind. Juniors

67%

Draw or Ind. Juniors

61%

Winning margin

22 de Julio wins by 2+

15%

Ind. Juniors wins by 2+

9%

Team goals

22 de Julio 1+ goals

64%

22 de Julio 2+ goals

27%

22 de Julio 3+ goals

8%

Ind. Juniors 1+ goals

55%

Ind. Juniors 2+ goals

19%

Ind. Juniors 3+ goals

5%

Draw no bet

22 de Julio (draw refunded)

58%

Ind. Juniors (draw refunded)

42%

Combos

Both score & 3+ goals

22%

Both score & under 3

13%

Model probabilities, not odds. For information only.

How is this calculated?

Every number below comes from this match — nothing is made up.

1

Recent form of each side

22 de Julio at home — creates 0.88, concedes 0.60 · 25 matches

Ind. Juniors away — creates 1.01, concedes 1.15 · 124 matches

⚑ Home and away form are counted separately — the home-field edge is already baked into these numbers.

2

Expected goals for this match

22 de Julio attack 0.88 + Ind. Juniors defence 1.15 → ÷2 → 1.01

Ind. Juniors attack 1.01 + 22 de Julio defence 0.60 → ÷2 → 0.80

Each side's attack is blended with the other's defence, then averaged.

3

Chance of every scoreline

From those two numbers a Poisson distribution gives the probability of each exact score — the grid shown above.

4

The answer to "why 39%?"

22 de Julio scores more

39%

level

33%

Ind. Juniors scores more

28%

22 de Julio at 39% is simply the biggest of the three — that is the pick.

What the model can't see

It reads only the stats of recent matches. It knows nothing about:

injuries & suspensions
the matchday lineup
motivation — cup, relegation, a title race
weather & pitch condition
in-game coaching decisions

So 39% does not mean "22 de Julio will win" — it means "on the available stats, this is the most likely result."

Statistical model based on expected goals (xG). For informational purposes only.

Match Events

45'

K. Montano

22

Ind.

Manager: E. Valencia

Manager: J. Armas